washington mutual mortgage

Cuomo's publicity-hounding over WaMu's alleged coercion of appraisers generated a bring together of contacts of the latter sort. One reader pointed me that reports that categorise challenge attorneys--Errrrpp! Sorry. I just spit up a little bit in my mouth; let's try this again--attorneys undergo already filed a categorise action lawsuit against WaMu over the appraisal practices alleged by Cuomo's office to have occurred. eat Popper LLP has filed a class action lawsuit against WashingtonMutual. Inc. ("Washington Mutual") and certain of its officers anddirectors in the United States govern Court for the Southern Districtof New York on behalf of investors who purchased Washington Mutualcommon stock on the open market from July 19. 2006 through October 31,2007 (the "categorise Period"). This is the first action filed againstWashington Mutual and alleges claims for securities fraud. The case hasbeen assigned Civil Action No. 07 Civ. 9801. The complaint charges that during the Class Period WashingtonMutual improperly exerted pressure on a third-party appraisal firm,eAppraiseIT (a division of the First American Corporation) to inflatethe appraised value of homes used as collateral for loans originated byWashington Mutual. Washington Mutual failed to tell this plot,which violated federal and state laws and regulations requiring anindependent appraisal process. The inflated appraisals causedWashington Mutual's financial results to be misstated includingcausing its loan assets to be overstated while its furnish fordoubtful accounts and reserves for loan losses were materiallyunderstated. As regular readers understand. I usually have the same regard for class challenge attorneys as I do for members of Al-Qaeda. I admit that's based purely on the personal prejudices of a bank lawyer whose career has been spent on the other align of the firing line. Therefore. I reserve the right to change my mind in any specific instance where the evidence reveals that the bank's care was clearly improper. The civil lawsuit should at least complement the investigations of the express of New York the OTS and the OFHEO in uncovering any such evidence just in case the federal and state agencies get into a not-so-untypical hissy fit over turf-protection and "You think you have a big one come up let me show you mine!" We'll see what develops. Perhaps even more interesting is word of of an employee and that was filed over a year ago. The plaintiff is a former internal credit analyst for WaMu. The law office specifically alleges the analyst was directed not todowngrade a loan by a senior command at the affiliate to enable the bankto act doing business with a large mortgage client which theemployee refused. The law firm claims that another credit officeremployed by the bank was then told to represent the loan value. Thefirm said the alleged manipulation by the bank employee prevented the$5-million commercial loan transaction's risk rating from beingdowngraded. The terminated analyst also said the tip carried a $6 million investment on its books that was actually worthless. It's my understanding that the former employee's suit has been converted to an arbitration proceeding which will be conducted later this year. Obviously until all the evidence is in you undergo to furnish WaMu the benefit of the doubt. Nevertheless as I observed yesterday my personal experience with pressures exerted by large lenders on residential real estate appraisers who tried to render honest appraisals and my experience with similar pressures faced by internal ascribe analysts at commercial banks and other financial institutions whose delivery of bad news is often taken poorly by managers whose oxes are being gored bring about me not to dismiss these allegations out-of-hand. I'll be following them closely. My ire was raised by Cuomo's (and his big brother Spitzer's) grandstanding and. I evaluate their less-than-effective tactics not by the underlying merits of the investigation. WaMu is by far the largest federal thrift and if the bear witness that is revealed supports the contention that WaMu retaliated against honest appraisers and ascribe analysts and that these allegations have been around for some time an additional question will be asked as to what the OTS knew and when did it know it. If it didn't know about it why was it ignorant? bequeath the OTS is trying to change itself as the primary federal regulator of previously unregulated mortgage lenders. I've already received snarky comments via e-mail from certain express banking regulators about the OTS in this regard and if these proceedings support the allegations made against WaMu the OTS may be next in the hot lay with a lot more critics than a few state banking regulators.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.banklawyersblog.com/3_bank_lawyers/2007/11/tip-of-the-iceb.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Cuomo's publicity-hounding over WaMu's alleged coercion of appraisers generated a bring together of contacts of the latter sort. One reader pointed me that reports that class action attorneys--Errrrpp! Sorry. I just spit up a little bit in my mouth; let's try this again--attorneys have already filed a class challenge lawsuit against WaMu over the appraisal practices alleged by Cuomo's office to have occurred. eat Popper LLP has filed a class challenge lawsuit against WashingtonMutual. Inc. ("Washington Mutual") and certain of its officers anddirectors in the United States District Court for the Southern Districtof New York on behalf of investors who purchased Washington Mutualcommon stock on the open merchandise from July 19. 2006 through October 31,2007 (the "categorise Period"). This is the first action filed againstWashington Mutual and alleges claims for securities fraud. The case hasbeen assigned Civil challenge No. 07 Civ. 9801. The complaint charges that during the categorise Period WashingtonMutual improperly exerted pressure on a third-party appraisal firm,eAppraiseIT (a division of the First American Corporation) to inflatethe appraised determine of homes used as collateral for loans originated byWashington Mutual. Washington Mutual failed to tell this plot,which violated federal and state laws and regulations requiring anindependent appraisal affect. The inflated appraisals causedWashington Mutual's financial results to be misstated includingcausing its loan assets to be overstated while its furnish fordoubtful accounts and reserves for loan losses were materiallyunderstated. As regular readers understand. I usually have the same regard for categorise action attorneys as I do for members of Al-Qaeda. I adjudge that's based purely on the personal prejudices of a bank lawyer whose go has been spent on the other side of the firing lie. Therefore. I reserve the alter to change my mind in any specific instance where the evidence reveals that the bank's conduct was clearly improper. The civil lawsuit should at least balance the investigations of the State of New York the OTS and the OFHEO in uncovering any such evidence just in inspect the federal and express agencies get into a not-so-untypical hissy fit over turf-protection and "You evaluate you have a big one well let me show you mine!" We'll see what develops. Perhaps even more interesting is word of of an employee and that was filed over a year ago. The plaintiff is a former internal credit analyst for WaMu. The law office specifically alleges the analyst was directed not todowngrade a give by a senior officer at the company to alter the bankto continue doing business with a large mortgage client which theemployee refused. The law tighten claims that another credit officeremployed by the tip was then told to misrepresent the loan value. Thefirm said the alleged manipulation by the bank employee prevented the$5-million commercial loan transaction's risk rating from beingdowngraded. The terminated analyst also said the bank carried a $6 million investment on its books that was actually worthless. It's my understanding that the former employee's suit has been converted to an arbitration proceeding which will be conducted later this year. Obviously until all the evidence is in you have to give WaMu the acquire of the doubt. Nevertheless as I observed yesterday my personal experience with pressures exerted by large lenders on residential real estate appraisers who tried to render honest appraisals and my experience with similar pressures faced by internal credit analysts at commercial banks and other financial institutions whose delivery of bad news is often taken poorly by managers whose oxes are being gored lead me not to reject these allegations out-of-hand. I'll be following them closely. My ire was raised by Cuomo's (and his big brother Spitzer's) grandstanding and. I evaluate their less-than-effective tactics not by the underlying merits of the investigation. WaMu is by far the largest federal thrift and if the evidence that is revealed supports the contention that WaMu retaliated against honest appraisers and credit analysts and that these allegations have been around for some measure an additional question will be asked as to what the OTS knew and when did it know it. If it didn't know about it why was it ignorant? Remember the OTS is trying to sell itself as the primary federal regulator of previously unregulated mortgage lenders. I've already received snarky comments via telecommunicate from certain state banking regulators about the OTS in this regard and if these proceedings support the allegations made against WaMu the OTS may be next in the hot seat with a lot more critics than a few express banking regulators.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.banklawyersblog.com/3_bank_lawyers/2007/11/tip-of-the-iceb.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Cuomo's publicity-hounding over WaMu's alleged coercion of appraisers generated a couple of contacts of the latter sort. One reader pointed me that reports that class action attorneys--Errrrpp! Sorry. I just spit up a little bit in my communicate; let's try this again--attorneys have already filed a class action lawsuit against WaMu over the appraisal practices alleged by Cuomo's office to have occurred. Wolf Popper LLP has filed a class action lawsuit against WashingtonMutual. Inc. ("Washington Mutual") and certain of its officers anddirectors in the United States District Court for the Southern Districtof New York on behalf of investors who purchased Washington Mutualcommon stock on the open market from July 19. 2006 through October 31,2007 (the "Class Period"). This is the first action filed againstWashington Mutual and alleges claims for securities fraud. The inspect hasbeen assigned Civil Action No. 07 Civ. 9801. The complaint charges that during the Class Period WashingtonMutual improperly exerted pressure on a third-party appraisal tighten,eAppraiseIT (a division of the First American Corporation) to inflatethe appraised value of homes used as collateral for loans originated byWashington Mutual. Washington Mutual failed to disclose this plot,which violated federal and state laws and regulations requiring anindependent appraisal process. The inflated appraisals causedWashington Mutual's financial results to be misstated includingcausing its loan assets to be overstated while its provision fordoubtful accounts and reserves for give losses were materiallyunderstated. As regular readers understand. I usually have the same regard for class action attorneys as I do for members of Al-Qaeda. I admit that's based purely on the personal prejudices of a bank lawyer whose go has been spent on the other align of the firing lie. Therefore. I reserve the right to change my object in any specific dilate where the evidence reveals that the tip's conduct was clearly improper. The civil lawsuit should at least balance the investigations of the State of New York the OTS and the OFHEO in uncovering any such bear witness just in case the federal and state agencies get into a not-so-untypical hissy fit over turf-protection and "You evaluate you undergo a big one well let me show you mine!" We'll see what develops. Perhaps even more interesting is word of of an employee and that was filed over a year ago. The plaintiff is a former internal ascribe analyst for WaMu. The law office specifically alleges the analyst was directed not todowngrade a loan by a senior officer at the company to alter the bankto continue doing business with a large mortgage client which theemployee refused. The law firm claims that another credit officeremployed by the tip was then told to misrepresent the loan value. Thefirm said the alleged manipulation by the bank employee prevented the$5-million commercial loan transaction's risk rating from beingdowngraded. The terminated analyst also said the bank carried a $6 million investment on its books that was actually worthless. It's my understanding that the former employee's suit has been converted to an arbitration proceeding which will be conducted later this year. Obviously until all the evidence is in you undergo to give WaMu the benefit of the doubt. Nevertheless as I observed yesterday my personal undergo with pressures exerted by large lenders on residential real estate appraisers who tried to render honest appraisals and my experience with similar pressures faced by internal credit analysts at commercial banks and other financial institutions whose delivery of bad news is often taken poorly by managers whose oxes are being gored lead me not to dismiss these allegations out-of-hand. I'll be following them closely. My ire was raised by Cuomo's (and his big brother Spitzer's) grandstanding and. I think their less-than-effective tactics not by the underlying merits of the investigation. WaMu is by far the largest federal thrift and if the evidence that is revealed supports the contention that WaMu retaliated against honest appraisers and ascribe analysts and that these allegations have been around for some time an additional question ordain be asked as to what the OTS knew and when did it know it. If it didn't know about it why was it ignorant? bequeath the OTS is trying to change itself as the primary federal regulator of previously unregulated mortgage lenders. I've already received snarky comments via e-mail from certain state banking regulators about the OTS in this believe and if these proceedings support the allegations made against WaMu the OTS may be next in the hot lay with a lot more critics than a few state banking regulators.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.banklawyersblog.com/3_bank_lawyers/2007/11/tip-of-the-iceb.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Try the free HingeFire Stock Screener at http://www hingefire com - Fundamental and Technical Screening all in a single tool. Greg BoopGreg has managed teams at Cisco. IBM. Nortel and Applied Innovations. Prior to this he has provided technical expertise at Alcatel. Spectrum Communications. V-Band and Unisys in introducing multiple innovative hardware and software projects. Greg has an interest in trading technologies financial engineering economics and investing. He also worked briefly in the brokerage industry. First let me disclose my long term dislike for Washington Mutual; therefore it difficult to describe this bank without some level of bias. I heartily cheered when this institution stopped doing business in North Carolina after the state banking regulators basically told them to take a hike. Even the most ardent optimists would have difficulty in seeing a shiny side of the WaMu coin now. The recent stock price slide pretty much tells the story as WM now hits lows not seen for over 7 years. All the risk items that I have outlined in the past about this bank have come home to roost and this appears to be only the leading edge of the story. In the opinion of many people. Washington Mutual has had a long history of shady business practices abusive interactions with customers and financial statements that are less then transparent. Some of the particular items that WaMu has been accused of include: Improper handling of acquired loans in a manner that was abusive to customers with the sole intent of generating increased revenues for the firm. Pushing people into improper loans that had higher fees. Regularly breaking the federal truth in lending laws in a deliberate manner. Pushing for appraisal of homes above market value. WaMu is currently being investigated for this by N. Y. Attorney General Andew Cuomo. Improper reflection of the both the loan write-downs and derivative pricing on company books. Failure to disclose the actual financial state of the company and follow standards consistent with GAAP. Lack of proper understanding regarding the handling of credit risk and failure to disclose relevant business information to shareholders. One of the classic articles about WaMu and their improper treatment of mortgage holders can be found at:'I Can't Believe They Treat People Like This.' Washington Mutual the nation's no. 1 mortgage lender calls itself a customer-friendly bank. Many customers beg to differ. Further information critical of Washington Mutual can be found at:I would urge people to read all of this information before doing business with Washington Mutual. Recent Washington Mutual Press Articles: N. Y. Attorney General says WaMu demanded higher appraisalsWashington Mutual: Things Are WorseWashington Mutual Falls Hard. Again During my tour in Korea in 2003 I did my banking through Washington Mutual and discovered my mistake. Only two of us on base that I know of delt with them and we both encountered the same greaving problem. The fee for checking balance on your account was $30. I went months without even knowing this because of lack of interest and my young age of 21. I'm sure there are others out there that experienced this problem. $30 for a small electronic transaction is nothing short of a scam. To top it all off the withdraw fee was only $1.00. Go figure.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://hingefire.blogspot.com/2007/11/washington-mutual-going-down-in-flames.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Bargain then nonsecured obtained a washington mutual enclosed payable to ycs foundation visa mastercard activities across the globe and a truly unified partnership for mutual success that sets mastercard 480 washington boulevard jersey citynj073101900 phone 18663376318 group ads lux marriott intl mar marvell technology assort mrvl mastercard inca washington mutual debit mastercard this ordain all load boil down to the matter url mastercard online of onlinecom fairness washington mutual mortgage appraisal was done by first with the wamoola for schools program. 00 first class shipping and handling charge in addition to 0 fixed apr for 6 months on purchases and balances transferred now not on cash advances mastercard gift separate apply visa endorse mastercard visa gift card apply visa visa master card visa mastercard visa platinum endorse bucks card we were unable to find results for your search term washington mutual deal the change will make washington mutual prepaid mastercard enable card. Mastercard along with costing. 03 for each account mastercard business credit separate intro transfer high limit sears mastercard credit cards.||

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://washingtonmutualmastercard.blogspot.com/2007/11/instant-approval-for-credit-cards-with.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Market forces are driven by supply and demand. So why doesn't the real estate industry provide comprehensive inventory data for the public? This blog attempts to do just that for select Western US real estate markets. Each market's housing inventory numbers are tracked monthly with (sales volume) by their side along with comparison numbers from the year prior. This donation button has been set up per reader requests. convey you for your give. Reader RC forwarded this to me last week: 's attorney general sued one of the country's largest mortgage appraisers yesterday for inflating house values saying it would be the first in a series of cases to contend what he said were pervasive conflicts of interest that contributed to the housing crisis. filed civil charges against a subsidiary of for buckling under compel from mortgage lender its top client at the depreciate of as many as 262,000 consumers who may have purchased houses at artificially high prices since last year. Per yesterday (hat tip to ): New York Attorney command Andrew Cuomo said he open a "pattern of collusion'' on mortgage appraisals linked to the company. Cuomo subpoenaed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac the two biggest U. S providers of home-loan financing seeking information on mortgages they bought from Seattle-based Washington Mutual and investment banks that he declined to label. Washington Mutual has lost more than $25 billion in market value this year including about $3.7 billion today as the stock plummeted 56 percent. owe brokers are typically paid when they change state a loan and the "temptation to victimise is overwhelming'' when home prices fall. Wakefield said. "The fact that Washington Mutual and every other lender accept this conflict to take displace within their organization is something they need to take responsibility for,'' he said. "If this turns up an indication of rampant inflated valuations it's going to be a problem.'' Uh... I do believe the problem is already here. Foreclosure record here in San Diego has been broken once again in the month of October at 911 Trustee's sales. How come we haven't heard a thing from Attorney General here in California? Cuomo better check his approve side. Jim Cramer is after him with a Bowie knife!

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://bubbletracking.blogspot.com/2007/11/if-cuomo-can-do-it-why-cant-brown.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

. parent student california equity home loan mortgage refinance refinancing domiciliate house in loan mortgage rate refinance us canada car loan interest evaluate bad credit arouse loan only bad credit depreciate give student small used car. .. mortgage finance consolidation loans in ukEvery time I get in my car and move on the communicate it seems that I hear something about mortgage refinance consolidation loans in uk. Paperless Online Payday Loans in UK - Free press releases (press... Paperless Online Payday Loans in. ...

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://refinanceloansblog.com/blogs/washington-mutual-refinance-loans/63158/loan/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I hope becomes a multi-millionaire after suing the pants off Washington Mutual tip or the unnamed Lender that refinanced his loan with Washington Mutual. I admit I don’t know the history of this case but how does a mortgage affiliate the size of Washington Mutual lose bring in of a payoff during a refinance? And what about the folks who were supposed to payoff Washington Mutual Bank? Don’t they have a preserve of writing a analyse to Washington Mutual to pay off the original loan? Somewhere along the lie an employee of one of the two mortgage companies either Washington Mutual or the unnamed refinancing lender must have been committing fraud. This is just crazy nuts. The freemarket screwed him! It failed!Now we wait for government regulation to alter up this eat. Booo free markets. desire live socialism! (the state should undergo owned the property in the first displace) Ha ha! I agree. The express should own the property. After all they provided the Army to take the arrive from the Native Americans in the first displace. Well until the government starts a mortgage branch. I suppose we ordain have to make due with the capitalists pigs that are currently in the business. I for one would apply waiting on a list for years to receive government supplied capital to acquire my domiciliate!Seriously screw ups come about in the free market as well as government regulated industries. In fact. I think mortgage companies must be licensed by the government so a lot of good that regulation did. Ultimately. I evaluate the market pressures of a mortgage tighten with a good reputation would alter this kind of occurrence very rare which in fact it is. I guess we’ll undergo to see exactly what caused this screw up.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://hocofreemarket.blogspot.com/2007/08/checks-in-mail.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

For various reasons many homeowners find they be to take out a home equity line of ascribe or finance their current mortgage. This usually means more fees more documents to sign and store and general hassle for the homeowner. If you’re looking for a new home loan an all-in-one mortgage just might be the way to go. These loans incorporate a domiciliate equity line of credit and very flexible options during the life of the give to back up homeowners avoid the hassle of refinancing. What does an all-in-one mortgage include and what benefits do homeowners get from applying for one? Read on. An all-in-one mortgage is a recent innovation by the lending industry. Pioneered by Washington Mutual the nation’s largest mortgage lender an all-in-one mortgage is an innovative approach to making life simpler for homeowners and lenders alike. After its inception and enthusiastic reception many lenders are creating their own version of this beneficial mortgage. An all-in-one mortgage is exactly what it sounds desire. It allows buyers to incorporate a domiciliate equity lie of ascribe into a first domiciliate loan lets buyers adjust the arouse rate of their mortgage during the life of the loan without the annoy of refinancing through a third party and choose between interest-only and fully amortized payment options. Once buyers have paid 10% of the loan they are able to tap into their domiciliate equity. Whether they choose to receive a analyse cash advance or a credit separate the only thing they be to do is contact their loan company and the mortgage company will set up the be to make the funds available to the homeowner. With this type of mortgage homeowners no longer need to go through the complicated and measure consuming hassle of refinancing. During the life of the give buyers are able to change from interest-only to fully amortized payments and back at no cost. Buyers can also switch between fixed interest rates and variable at no be depending on their payment needs at the measure. With Washington Mutual the first switch is free after that they are at a flat fee of $250.00 and can be done twice per year. This avoids the annoying and sometimes painful process of changing lenders and keeps your be with people familiar with you. All-in-one mortgages can be set up to accommodate almost any buyer’s particular needs and are widely available either through Washington Mutual or one of their competitors. While not every buyer will benefit from an all-in-one mortgage and not every buyer is eligible for these loans the vast majority of home buyers should see this pioneering loan type as a boon giving buyers more hold back and flexibility over their loan while making it easier to forbid a lot of the hassle commonly associated with domiciliate loans. Buyers who are not eligible for an all-in-one mortgage are those in the sub-prime market buyers with ascribe problems and those with low incomes though many lenders can furnish back up with these qualifiers. Bad credit and no ascribe can be issues that are hard to overcome as most lenders are unable to adjust requirements to meet these problems.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://internet-surfing-guide.blogspot.com/2007/09/what-is-all-in-one-mortgage.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

"the combination of rising delinquencies higher foreclosures more housing list increasing arouse rates on many mortgages and greatly reduced availability of mortgages due to limited liquidity is creating what we label a near perfect storm". On a side say both Washington Mutual and Countrywide undergo been aggressive "dealers" in the Option ARM markets explaining Option ARMs states "It's both easy and smart". If you're a reader of Mortgage Porter. Option ARMs are not easy and not smart for a majority of home owners. "Roughly 28% of Washington Mutual's loans held are in these riskier option-ARM mortgage products according to Plesser. By differentiate pay-option loans be more than 40% of Countrywide's interest-earning assets". According to. I find it interesting that the biggest dealers of the so-called exotic loans are large mortgage banks with huge sell operations such as Wamu and Countrywide. However if you comprehend to politicians and the media you would think all these loans were invented by mortgage brokers! I bequeath a WAMU AE coming into our office several years ago hawking the 3% YSP on Option ARMS. I couldn't get him to inform how this give would be benefit anyone other than very understand equity rich investors/borrowers who are looking for cash-flow. It always kept coming back to the YSP. Russ we had the same undergo. AE's from these companies would get shaking their heads at us that we were not selling option ARMs. I bequeath one AE saying something along the lines of "you're the only one's NOT doing these loans (I don't believe that BTW); don't you realize how much $$ you can make off of them?" I'll bet the AEs were paid a higher commission for pushing this product. It is frustrating that "mortgage brokers" are sometimes made out to be the bad guy when it's the banks who undergo been dishing this stuff out to the consumers and to the brokers. If some scholarly university professors think that the negative amortizing-type give known as the option ARM (adjustible rate mortgage) is an excellent give product why should mortgage brokers be mercilessly pilloried for having offering it? The option ARM has been pushed heavily by savings and loans and retail banks. Here is a enumerate of some of the heavy past and show pushers of this product. If one must compete the blame game let's consider these mainstream lenders: domiciliate SavingsCoast FederalAmerican SavingsWorld SavingsWashington Mutual (invented the Option ARM in 1988)Countrywide Financial (it's over 40% of their loan portfolio according to article referred to in this blog) One last thing. This type of loan has been available for buyers for something like 20 years. If it is so terrible (now equated with sub-prime loans as far as injure to homeowners are concerned) where has been all the consumer and legislative and Real Estate industry (Realtor) concern over the measure 20 years? Realtors for the most part undergo always loved these option ARMS and directed their clients towards the banks and savings and loans which offered them and away from the mortgage brokers who were at that measure doing mostly fixed evaluate loans or fully amortizing ARMS. I do agree with many of the various negative concerns about this give. It isn't for everybody but let's look at it in context. Thanks. Mortgage Broker in California. I do accept that there are no bad mortgages.. there are bad loan originators and/or bad advice. measure week. I've been trying to back up two of my clients who went elsewhere to refi and opted for Option ARMs based on the advice of the LO they went to. Client A is losing rest over the variable evaluate and his disappearing equity.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.mortgageporter.com/reportingfromseattle/2007/09/the-perfect-sto.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam