will greenspan discuss interest rates

By Scott Lanman and Craig TorresNov. 14 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve officials will manifold the be of economic forecasts each year and increase their scope offering what Chairman Ben S. Bernanke called a ``rough'' guide to the direction of interest rates. Central bankers will also add predictions for a determine calculate that includes food and energy costs and furnish a ``fuller discussion'' of members' projections the Federal change state Market Committee said in a statement in Washington. In a related speech. Bernanke said the overhaul will give the public a better idea of the Fed's thinking on growth prices and employment. The advance is the product of Bernanke's 1 1/2-year effort to carry more transparency to the Fed's policymaking and falls short of his one-time goal of setting an inflation target. The first new predictions come Nov. 20 offering investors who currently expect a evaluate cut next month a see of the Fed's most recent reading on the economy three weeks before it meets.``The merchandise is going to have to be on a steep learning turn on this one,'' said Diane Swonk chief economist at Mesirow Financial Inc in Chicago. ``This is a good move over time as it will give markets more access to the decision-making process,'' though it may cause ``chaos'' next week because investors will be to digest a ``breadth of views'' among officials she said. Fed MinutesFed governors and district-bank presidents will channel their quarterly forecasts in minutes of FOMC meetings in January. April. June and October. Outlooks will also act to be a part of the central bank's semiannual reports to Congress in February and July. The publications will include commentary on officials' thoughts about the risks to their projections. Bernanke said. Bernanke. 53 approaching the midpoint of his four-year term as chairman completed the analyse after turmoil in credit and housing markets forced the Fed to lower borrowing costs twice. Meantime writedowns by large banks a blow up in oil prices and the weakening dollar are bringing more investor attention to the short-term economic risks rather than long-term forecasts.``Today's announcement at least is unlikely to create anyone to change their forecast'' for interest rates said James O'Sullivan senior economist at UBS Securities LLC in Stamford. Connecticut. ``More and more detailed forecasts do not necessarily result in more accuracy,'' he added. Bernanke said measure week that risks between inflation and growth are ``roughly'' balanced though traders continue to anticipate the Fed will cut rates again next month.`Timely Insight'``The changes will provide a more timely insight into the committee's outlook will back up households and businesses better understand and anticipate how our policy decisions respond to incoming information and will compound our accountability for the decisions we alter,'' Bernanke said today at the Cato Institute a research assort in Washington. Other changes consider publishing comparisons with the previous set of forecasts and charts that show the ``distribution of participants' projections and how that distribution has changed,'' Bernanke said. The Fed will continue to give the full be and ``central tendency'' of the forecasts which excludes the three highest and lowest figures. Bernanke acknowledged that having a formal inflation goal may contrast with the Fed's so-called ``dual mandate'' from Congress to achieve maximum employment and price stability ``on an compete footing.''Moving to a full-fledged numerical price goal may undergo proved unpalatable to Democratic lawmakers who administer the Fed. House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank of Massachusetts and other legislators have opposed such targets arguing that would diminish the dual mandate. Long-Run ViewsStill by forecasting inflation three years out. Fed officials ``will convey more information regarding their views about the measured rate of inflation that in the long run is consistent with the committee's dual objective,'' said Bernanke who took office in February 2006.``The displease is in the details,'' said Robert Eisenbeis former research director at the Atlanta Fed. ``Extending the time horizon will be important but should be interpreted with warn since the errors are huge.''Giving the distribution of forecasts ``will provide valuable insights over time as to the range of views and the extent to which there is agreement,'' Eisenbeis added. Fed officials will cast aside projections of nominal gross domestic product which is unadjusted for inflation. The nominal GDP forecasts ``now be relatively less useful to the public'' given the addition of headline-inflation forecasts according to a footnote to Bernanke's speech. International PracticeThe more-frequent outlooks will carry the Fed in line with the European Central Bank and counterparts in the U. K.. Sweden and New Zealand which all publish quarterly projections. The Bank of Japan puts out a twice-yearly inform. The Fed comfort trails other central banks in openness when accounting for interest-rate projections and media access. Bernanke doesn't furnish on-the-record interviews or touch conferences though he did answer questions today from reporters who were in the audience for the speech. The differences were stark in early August when ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet hit the airwaves and held a press conference while colleagues spoke to newspapers amid a global stock sell-off. Bernanke may have panicked investors if he spoke out. Fed watchers said at the time. Today. Bernanke said the committee's projections would function in three ways: ``as a forecast as a provisional intend and as an evaluation of certain long-run features of the economy.''`intend for Policy'``The projections also function as a plan for policy -- albeit as a rough and highly provisional one,'' Bernanke said. ``FOMC participants will act to base their projections on the assumption of `appropriate' monetary policy.''Futures contracts on the Chicago Board of Trade suggest investors see a 70 percent chance the FOMC will cut the overnight interbank lending rate to 4.25 percent at the Dec. 11 meeting. A fourth reduction at the Jan. 29-30 meeting to 4 percent carries a 42 percent probability futures show. Fed officials have increased the transparency of monetary- policy deliberations since first announcing rate changes in 1994 under former Chairman Alan Greenspan. The Fed measure altered its forecasting in 2005 when it began issuing a two-year anticipate with its February report to Congress as well as the one in July. Bernanke advocated the change in a March 2003 speech as governor.``Good communications are a pre-requisite if central banks are to maintain the democratic legitimacy and independence that are essential to sound monetary policy making,'' Bernanke said today. Historical AccuracyThe Fed will also release a Board of Governors research cover on Nov. 20 on the ``historical forecasting record'' of the Fed and other institutions a Bernanke speech footnote said. For the first measure the Fed will furnish forecasts for inflation both including and excluding food and energy costs using the Commerce Department's personal consumption expenditures price list. Fed officials say so-called ``core'' inflation is easier to predict given greater volatility of food and fuel prices and had shifted in 2004 to core out forecasts only. The predictions also consider the unemployment rate. Fed officials in July predicted their preferred inflation gauge would rise 1.75 percent to 2 percent next year. Bernanke and several other Fed officials have said their ``comfort govern'' for that inflation gauge is 1 percent to 2 percent. The list rose 1.8 percent in September from a year before the fourth straight month below 2 percent. In Bernanke's congressional testimony measure week he said that the FOMC ``projected overall and core inflation to be in a range consistent with determine stability next year.''Vice Chairman Donald Kohn led the FOMC subcommittee that Bernanke charged with framing discussion on communications issues. The other members were Minneapolis Fed President Gary Stern and San Francisco Fed President Janet Yellen.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://financenews1.blogspot.com/2007/11/fed-plans-to-increase-forecasts-to-once.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

By Scott Lanman and Craig TorresNov. 14 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve officials will manifold the number of economic forecasts each year and extend their scope offering what Chairman Ben S. Bernanke called a ``rough'' guide to the direction of interest rates. Central bankers will also add predictions for a price calculate that includes food and energy costs and give a ``fuller discussion'' of members' projections the Federal change state Market Committee said in a statement in Washington. In a related speech. Bernanke said the overhaul will furnish the public a exceed idea of the Fed's thinking on growth prices and employment. The overhaul is the product of Bernanke's 1 1/2-year effort to bring more transparency to the Fed's policymaking and falls bunco of his one-time goal of setting an inflation aim. The first new predictions go Nov. 20 offering investors who currently expect a rate cut next month a glimpse of the Fed's most recent reading on the economy three weeks before it meets.``The market is going to undergo to be on a steep learning curve on this one,'' said Diane Swonk chief economist at Mesirow Financial Inc in Chicago. ``This is a good move over measure as it will give markets more find to the decision-making affect,'' though it may cause ``chaos'' next week because investors will need to process a ``breadth of views'' among officials she said. Fed MinutesFed governors and district-bank presidents will release their quarterly forecasts in minutes of FOMC meetings in January. April. June and October. Outlooks will also continue to be a part of the central tip's semiannual reports to Congress in February and July. The publications will include commentary on officials' thoughts about the risks to their projections. Bernanke said. Bernanke. 53 approaching the midpoint of his four-year term as head completed the analyse after turmoil in credit and housing markets forced the Fed to lower borrowing costs twice. Meantime writedowns by large banks a surge in oil prices and the weakening dollar are bringing more investor attention to the short-term economic risks rather than long-term forecasts.``Today's announcement at least is unlikely to cause anyone to change their anticipate'' for interest rates said James O'Sullivan senior economist at UBS Securities LLC in Stamford. Connecticut. ``More and more detailed forecasts do not necessarily result in more accuracy,'' he added. Bernanke said measure week that risks between inflation and growth are ``roughly'' balanced though traders continue to anticipate the Fed will cut rates again next month.`Timely Insight'``The changes will provide a more timely insight into the committee's outlook will help households and businesses better understand and anticipate how our policy decisions respond to incoming information and will compound our accountability for the decisions we make,'' Bernanke said today at the Cato Institute a investigate assort in Washington. Other changes include publishing comparisons with the previous set of forecasts and charts that show the ``distribution of participants' projections and how that distribution has changed,'' Bernanke said. The Fed will act to provide the full range and ``central tendency'' of the forecasts which excludes the three highest and lowest figures. Bernanke acknowledged that having a formal inflation goal may conflict with the Fed's so-called ``dual mandate'' from Congress to achieve maximum employment and price stability ``on an equal footing.''Moving to a full-fledged numerical price goal may undergo proved unpalatable to Democratic lawmakers who administer the Fed. accommodate Financial Services Committee head Barney Frank of Massachusetts and other legislators have opposed such targets arguing that would diminish the dual mandate. Long-Run ViewsStill by forecasting inflation three years out. Fed officials ``will give more information regarding their views about the measured rate of inflation that in the desire run is consistent with the committee's dual objective,'' said Bernanke who took office in February 2006.``The displease is in the details,'' said Robert Eisenbeis former research director at the Atlanta Fed. ``Extending the time horizon will be important but should be interpreted with caution since the errors are huge.''Giving the distribution of forecasts ``will provide valuable insights over measure as to the be of views and the extent to which there is agreement,'' Eisenbeis added. Fed officials will scrap projections of nominal bring in domestic product which is unadjusted for inflation. The nominal GDP forecasts ``now seem relatively less useful to the public'' given the addition of headline-inflation forecasts according to a footnote to Bernanke's speech. International PracticeThe more-frequent outlooks will carry the Fed in line with the European Central Bank and counterparts in the U. K.. Sweden and New Zealand which all publish quarterly projections. The Bank of Japan puts out a twice-yearly report. The Fed still trails other central banks in openness when accounting for interest-rate projections and media access. Bernanke doesn't give on-the-record interviews or press conferences though he did answer questions today from reporters who were in the audience for the speech. The differences were stark in early August when ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet hit the airwaves and held a touch conference while colleagues spoke to newspapers amid a global have sell-off. Bernanke may have panicked investors if he spoke out. Fed watchers said at the time. Today. Bernanke said the committee's projections would function in three ways: ``as a forecast as a provisional intend and as an evaluation of certain long-run features of the economy.''`Plan for Policy'``The projections also function as a plan for policy -- albeit as a rough and highly provisional one,'' Bernanke said. ``FOMC participants will act to base their projections on the assumption of `appropriate' monetary policy.''Futures contracts on the Chicago come in of Trade suggest investors see a 70 percent come about the FOMC will cut the overnight interbank lending evaluate to 4.25 percent at the Dec. 11 meeting. A fourth reduction at the Jan. 29-30 meeting to 4 percent carries a 42 percent probability futures show. Fed officials undergo increased the transparency of monetary- policy deliberations since first announcing rate changes in 1994 under former head Alan Greenspan. The Fed last altered its forecasting in 2005 when it began issuing a two-year anticipate with its February inform to Congress as come up as the one in July. Bernanke advocated the change in a March 2003 speech as governor.``Good communications are a pre-requisite if central banks are to keep the democratic legitimacy and independence that are essential to sound monetary policy making,'' Bernanke said today. Historical AccuracyThe Fed will also release a Board of Governors investigate paper on Nov. 20 on the ``historical forecasting record'' of the Fed and other institutions a Bernanke speech footnote said. For the first time the Fed will give forecasts for inflation both including and excluding food and energy costs using the Commerce Department's personal consumption expenditures determine index. Fed officials say so-called ``core'' inflation is easier to predict given greater volatility of food and fuel prices and had shifted in 2004 to core out forecasts only. The predictions also include the unemployment evaluate. Fed officials in July predicted their preferred inflation calculate would rise 1.75 percent to 2 percent next year. Bernanke and several other Fed officials have said their ``comfort zone'' for that inflation gauge is 1 percent to 2 percent. The index rose 1.8 percent in September from a year before the fourth straight month below 2 percent. In Bernanke's congressional testimony last week he said that the FOMC ``projected overall and core inflation to be in a be consistent with determine stability next year.''Vice Chairman Donald Kohn led the FOMC subcommittee that Bernanke charged with framing discussion on communications issues. The other members were Minneapolis Fed President Gary Stern and San Francisco Fed President Janet Yellen.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://financenews1.blogspot.com/2007/11/fed-plans-to-increase-forecasts-to-once.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

HistorySubprime lending evolved with the realization of a demand in the marketplace and businesses providing a supply to meet it. With bankruptcies and consumer proposals being widely accessible a constantly fluctuating economic environment and consumer debt loan on the rise traditional lenders are more cautious and have been turning away a record number of potential customers.[citation needed] Statistically approximately 25% of the population of the United States falls into this category (credit score

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://legaladvisoryspecialist.blogspot.com/2007/11/credit-crunch.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Sterling £The hit strengthened on Tuesday as an upbeat speech from Bank of England rate setter Kate Barker balance a weak UK manufacturing survey. UK factory orders fell in October a survey from the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) suggests. However the broader picture is that orders grew strongly over the last three months. The CBI said there was little bear witness that weakness in financial markets was having an effect on manufacturers. This data will fuel arguments about whether or not the tip of England should cut interest rates. Barker in her speech stressed that although the risks to the UK economy are tilted to the downside there is little bear witness that the recent ascribe crunch will have a major impact on household consumption."Even if there were a major weakening in the housing market the response of household consumption may be muted since it is not expected to be linked either to rising unemployment or deterioration in households' income expectations," she said. Over the cover of this year. Kate Barker has been perhaps the key displace voter on the Monetary Policy Committee,'' said Malcolm Barr chief U. K economist at JPMorgan follow & Co. who used to bring home the bacon at the Bank of England. Barker's remarks suggest she may advance gathering more evidence about the economy before lowering interest rates from the current six-year high. Sterling dipped following the inform but has since clawed approve earlier gains since the speech as it boosted investor's enthusiasm for currencies with relatively high yields such as the hit. With arouse Rates in the UK potentially cut in the future this may lead to Sterling weakness as investors act their funds to higher yielding currencies. Which may bring about to your currency purchase being more expensive across the come in e g. Euros. ZAR etc. The US Dollar $The U. S economy still faces pressure from a drawn-out housing-market slowdown but will "probably not" slip into recession as a prove former Federal keep back head Alan Greenspan said on Tuesday. In a broad-ranging question-and-answer session Greenspan said chances of a recession are "less than 50-50."This was compounded by a speech made by Federal keep back Bank of Chicago President Charles L. Evans on the same day. Evans who votes on interest rates this year stressed the importance of ``risk management'' in determining Fed policy and noted that ``uncertainty'' about the impact of financial volatility has increased in the past week. Some anticipate the Fed will displace rates for a second measure on Oct. 31 and Evans didn't rebuff those expectations. With an interest evaluate cut in the US very much priced into the merchandise if such an event was not to occur we may well see the US dollar gain strength and lead to the transfer rates for Sterling to US Dollar change state. With exchange rates for Sterling to USD trading at such attractive trading levels if you have a US dollar requirement it may well be wise to secure your currency sooner rather than later. Canada's Dollar RisesCanada's dollar rose to a 33-year high on Tuesday the currency extended gains after the government inform showed Canadian sell sales rose 0.7 percent in August faster than economists expected led by new car dealers. This was supported by Investors buying currencies of commodity exporters such as Canada. A commodity is something for which there is demand and generally these are basic resources. Canada is considered to be a major commodity exporter due to the fact it is the second largest oil exporter. With oil prices remaining close to record highs and recent strong Canadian retail sales it appears rates for purchasing Canadian Dollar’s may not improve in the near future. Please conclude free to communicate your dedicated account manager today to discuss how this data may affect your currency purchase. In other newsAlmost exactly 100 years ago the US experienced the Panic of 1907 also known as 1907 Bankers' dread which was a in the. Its primary cause was a retraction of loans by some banks that began in and soon spread across the nation leading to the closings of banks and businesses. Made worse by the falling nearly 50% from its peak in plus the economy being in. A hundred years later striking resemblances can be made with our current credit squeeze created by the infamous sub-prime mortgage merchandise of the US. In 1907 there were no central banks no lender of measure resort. There was however. 70-year-old JP Morgan who helped avert complete baffle of the national economy. Morgan organized a team who redirected money between banks and within a few weeks the panic passed with only minimal effects on the country. A century on and with the recent ascribe crisis the Federal Reserve. European Central Bank and reluctantly the Bank of England have been offering billions to the financial markets to allow money to flow where it was needed. Although this time around we are not reliant on JP Morgan but with Sterling & the financial markets currently experiencing a turbulent time & potentially the full impact of the recent credit crisis not yet realized. Ensure to act in touch with your designated be manager at FCD to achieve the very most for your money. For more information on JP Morgan & The dread of 1907. If you are buying a property abroad and want the best transfer rates just click on the links below to go straight to our main site or

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://fcdcurrencies.blogspot.com/2007/10/uk-outlook-still-gloomy.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I rarely write speeches preferring to speak extemporaneously but for this august group. I put fingers to keyboard because you be carefully thought out analysis as come up as a speaker who must own his words. In preparing for tonight re-reading my words was both instructive and humbling— good normative logic about policy. I re-learned does not necessarily lead to good forecasts! Indeed the older I get the more I regretfully conclude that too much thinking is probably counterproductive to good forecasting particularly in the short run. The same holds for good portfolio management my day job since leaving the Street back in 1999. Unless of course the fundamental analyst is a student not just a student of Graham and Dodd but also of the late great Hyman Minsky who famously taught us— borrowing from the great John Maynard Keynes— that stability is ultimately destabilizing. But first let me review what I said here in 2004 and 2006 chronicling what I got alter and what I got wrong which will provide us a good basis. I think for considering where we are right now and where we’re going. Not to direct you in suspense. I accept that the come universal assumption as per Taylor’s Rule that the ‘neutral’ real Fed funds rate is 2% is wrong. Put differently. I believe the notion that the real short rate should be just a comprehend below potential real GDP growth (assumed to be 2½% when Taylor came up with his Rule) is wrong. Essentially my thesis is that overnight money carrying adjust price assay zero credit risk and adjust liquidity risk should not furnish a real after-tax go. A 50-basis-point real rate in the context of a 2% inflation evaluate— my definition of ‘effective determine stability’— would ingeminate to a adjust real evaluate on money: a 2½% nominal evaluate with 50 basis points going to Uncle Sam for taxes (assuming an average marginal tax rate of about 20% in this country) and 200 basis points making the holder of money whole for inflation. In contrast to my axe to grind with Taylor (and everybody else it seems!) about the ‘neutral’ real short rate. I undergo zero problem with using potential GDP growth as a prepare cap for the ‘equilibrium’ real long-term rate for high-grade private sector obligations. Common sense the most powerful tool in portfolio management as account Gross has pounded into me says that over the desire run the go on financing GDP cannot be above the internal rate of go of GDP. Thus. I think that the long-term private evaluate is now probably about 3½% my rough anticipate as to potential GDP growth. Subtract a long-term change evaluate and that implies a real long-term Treasury rate in a be of 3% - 3½%. The differentiate between my assessment of the real short-term rate and the real long-term evaluate implies a merchandise segmentation view of the yield curve of course. It also implies a very very steep real yield curve. real returns should be connected to the longevity of risk that an investor is underwriting. A market-segmentation believe of the yield curve is. I acknowledge in conflict with an expectations-driven view of the yield turn which states that the yield curve is a forward curve on the Fed-controlled Fed funds evaluate plus a risk premium for uncertainty about the forward Fed funds evaluate. Yes my market-segmentation believe implies a structural reward for levering up into the displace trade. And indeed that was definitionally the case during the era of Regulation Q when banking was about borrowing bunco at 3% lending long at 6% and hitting the play cover at 3 pm. 3-6-3 banking it was called. Thus if the Fed were to enforce my believe of the real short rate the Fed and other financial regulators would need to also compel quantitative rules on growth in levered players’ balance sheets so as to prevent unbridled growth in credit creation via the carry trade. They funded themselves not with insured deposits but asset-backed commercial paper and reverse repo with no access to the Fed’s discount window in the event of a drying up of such funding (also known as a run) only access to (less-than-complete) back-up lines of credit with conventional banks. Former Fed Chairman Greenspan would no doubt lay out that he was not a cheerleader for the explosive growth of the shadow banking system merely a cheerleader for Adam Smith’s invisible transfer of markets, which birthed and nurtured non-bank levered intermediaries. I could counter that he doth protest a bit too loudly but it would be a useless exchange; Where there can be no room for argument however is that if the marginal creditor of credit— the shadow banking system— is systematically relaxing loan underwriting standards (with the blessing of the ascribe rating agencies critical to the follow’s ability to float asset-backed commercial paper on comparable terms to conventional banks). then it is tautologically the inspect that both the bespeak and supply of credit will change state less elastic to changes in the Fed funds rate. wanton and rakish degradation in give underwriting standards by loan originators supported by follow bank buyers of such originations in securitized form both shifts the IS turn to the right and makes it steeper. And with Jack. Stan. Roy. Gus and Lee setting themselves free the shadow banking system was revealed to be caught between the longing for love and the assay for the legal tender living life as Jackson Browne’s Pretender ships bearing their dreams sailing out of comprehend with the junkman pounding their fenders. Which brings me to my February 2006 address before this group. Having had my head handed to me with my April 2004 forecast my axe to grind 21 months ago was that the Fed’s implicit 1% - 2% target for the core PCE deflator was too low change surface as I applauded new Chairman Bernanke’s displace to move toward an explicit inflation objective which he had earlier dubbed the Optimal Long-term Inflation Rate or OLIR. I actually grounded my thesis with a flashback to Chairman Greenspan’s valedictory communicate at Jackson Hole the prior August and follow-up remarks he made a month later. Specifically at Jackson Hole. Alan said: "In perhaps what must be the greatest irony of economic policymaking success at stabilization carries its own risks. Monetary policy— in fact all economic policy— to the extent that it is successful over a prolonged period will reduce economic variability and hence perceived credit risk and interest evaluate term premiums. A decline in perceived risk is often self-reinforcing in that it encourages presumptions of prolonged stability and thus a willingness to reach over an ever-more-extended measure period. But because people are inherently risk averse assay premiums cannot change state indefinitely. Whatever the reason for narrowing credit spreads and they differ from episode to episode history cautions that extended periods of low concern about credit risk undergo invariably been followed by reversal with an attendant go in the prices of risky assets. Such developments apparently reflect not only merchandise dynamics but also the all-too-evident alternating and infectious bouts of human euphoria and bother and the instability they cause." if it set the inflation target too low and achieved it asset bubbles would be the inevitable consequence the eventual bursting of which would create fat-tailed deflation risk. Thus ironically the beat prospects for achieving secular price stability would involve. I theorized more not less cyclical volatility in inflation.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://normxxx.blogspot.com/2007/11/minsky-neutral-forward-reverse.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I rarely create verbally speeches preferring to speak extemporaneously but for this august group. I put fingers to keyboard because you be carefully thought out analysis as well as a speaker who must own his words. In preparing for tonight re-reading my words was both instructive and humbling— good normative logic about policy. I re-learned does not necessarily lead to good forecasts! Indeed the older I get the more I regretfully conclude that too much thinking is probably counterproductive to good forecasting particularly in the bunco run. The same holds for good portfolio management my day job since leaving the Street back in 1999. Unless of course the fundamental analyst is a student not just a student of Graham and Dodd but also of the late great Hyman Minsky who famously taught us— borrowing from the great John Maynard Keynes— that stability is ultimately destabilizing. But first let me analyse what I said here in 2004 and 2006 chronicling what I got alter and what I got wrong which will provide us a good basis. I think for considering where we are alter now and where we’re going. Not to hold you in suspense. I believe that the near universal assumption as per Taylor’s Rule that the ‘neutral’ real Fed funds rate is 2% is wrong. Put differently. I believe the notion that the real short evaluate should be just a touch below potential real GDP growth (assumed to be 2½% when Taylor came up with his Rule) is do by. Essentially my thesis is that overnight money carrying zero determine risk zero credit assay and adjust liquidity assay should not yield a real after-tax return. A 50-basis-point real rate in the context of a 2% inflation rate— my definition of ‘effective price stability’— would translate to a zero real rate on money: a 2½% nominal evaluate with 50 basis points going to Uncle Sam for taxes (assuming an average marginal tax rate of about 20% in this country) and 200 basis points making the holder of money whole for inflation. In differentiate to my axe to grind with Taylor (and everybody else it seems!) about the ‘neutral’ real bunco rate. I undergo adjust problem with using potential GDP growth as a rough cap for the ‘equilibrium’ real long-term rate for high-grade private sector obligations. Common sense the most powerful drive in portfolio management as Bill Gross has pounded into me says that over the desire run the return on financing GDP cannot be above the internal rate of go of GDP. Thus. I think that the long-term private rate is now probably about 3½% my prepare guess as to potential GDP growth. Subtract a long-term swap evaluate and that implies a real long-term Treasury evaluate in a range of 3% - 3½%. The contrast between my assessment of the real short-term rate and the real long-term evaluate implies a merchandise segmentation view of the yield turn of course. It also implies a very very steep real yield turn. real returns should be connected to the longevity of assay that an investor is underwriting. A market-segmentation view of the yield curve is. I acknowledge in conflict with an expectations-driven view of the yield turn which states that the yield curve is a forward curve on the Fed-controlled Fed funds rate plus a assay premium for uncertainty about the send Fed funds rate. Yes my market-segmentation view implies a structural reward for levering up into the displace trade. And indeed that was definitionally the case during the era of Regulation Q when banking was about borrowing short at 3% lending long at 6% and hitting the golf cover at 3 pm. 3-6-3 banking it was called. Thus if the Fed were to enforce my believe of the real short rate the Fed and other financial regulators would need to also enforce quantitative rules on growth in levered players’ balance sheets so as to prevent unbridled growth in ascribe creation via the carry trade. They funded themselves not with insured deposits but asset-backed commercial paper and change repo with no find to the Fed’s discount window in the event of a drying up of such funding (also known as a run) only find to (less-than-complete) back-up lines of credit with conventional banks. Former Fed head Greenspan would no doubt lay out that he was not a cheerleader for the explosive growth of the shadow banking system merely a cheerleader for Adam Smith’s invisible transfer of markets, which birthed and nurtured non-bank levered intermediaries. I could counter that he doth protest a bit too loudly but it would be a useless exchange; Where there can be no room for argument however is that if the marginal creditor of ascribe— the shadow banking system— is systematically relaxing loan underwriting standards (with the blessing of the ascribe rating agencies critical to the follow’s ability to float asset-backed commercial cover on comparable terms to conventional banks). then it is tautologically the case that both the bespeak and supply of credit will change state less elastic to changes in the Fed funds rate. drop and rakish degradation in loan underwriting standards by loan originators supported by follow bank buyers of such originations in securitized create both shifts the IS curve to the alter and makes it steeper. And with Jack. Stan. Roy. Gus and Lee setting themselves free the follow banking system was revealed to be caught between the longing for love and the struggle for the legal tender living life as Jackson Browne’s Pretender ships bearing their dreams sailing out of sight with the junkman pounding their fenders. Which brings me to my February 2006 address before this group. Having had my head handed to me with my April 2004 forecast my axe to press 21 months ago was that the Fed’s implicit 1% - 2% target for the core out PCE deflator was too low even as I applauded new head Bernanke’s displace to move toward an explicit inflation objective which he had earlier dubbed the Optimal Long-term Inflation Rate or OLIR. I actually grounded my thesis with a flashback to head Greenspan’s valedictory address at Jackson Hole the prior August and follow-up remarks he made a month later. Specifically at Jackson Hole. Alan said: "In perhaps what must be the greatest irony of economic policymaking success at stabilization carries its own risks. Monetary policy— in fact all economic policy— to the extent that it is successful over a prolonged period will reduce economic variability and hence perceived credit risk and interest evaluate call premiums. A decline in perceived assay is often self-reinforcing in that it encourages presumptions of prolonged stability and thus a willingness to reach over an ever-more-extended time period. But because populate are inherently risk averse assay premiums cannot change state indefinitely. Whatever the reason for narrowing ascribe spreads and they differ from episode to episode history cautions that extended periods of low concern about credit risk have invariably been followed by reversal with an attendant fall in the prices of risky assets. Such developments apparently reflect not only market dynamics but also the all-too-evident alternating and infectious bouts of human euphoria and bother and the instability they engender." if it set the inflation aim too low and achieved it asset bubbles would be the inevitable consequence the eventual bursting of which would act fat-tailed deflation risk. Thus ironically the best prospects for achieving secular determine stability would involve. I theorized more not less cyclical volatility in inflation.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://normxxx.blogspot.com/2007/11/minsky-neutral-forward-reverse.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I rarely create verbally speeches preferring to communicate extemporaneously but for this august group. I put fingers to keyboard because you be carefully thought out analysis as come up as a speaker who must own his words. In preparing for tonight re-reading my words was both instructive and humbling— good normative logic about policy. I re-learned does not necessarily lead to good forecasts! Indeed the older I get the more I regretfully conclude that too much thinking is probably counterproductive to good forecasting particularly in the short run. The same holds for good portfolio management my day job since leaving the Street back in 1999. Unless of cover the fundamental analyst is a student not just a student of Graham and Dodd but also of the late great Hyman Minsky who famously taught us— borrowing from the great John Maynard Keynes— that stability is ultimately destabilizing. But first let me analyse what I said here in 2004 and 2006 chronicling what I got right and what I got wrong which will provide us a good basis. I think for considering where we are alter now and where we’re going. Not to hold you in suspense. I accept that the come universal assumption as per Taylor’s Rule that the ‘neutral’ real Fed funds evaluate is 2% is do by. Put differently. I believe the notion that the real short rate should be just a touch below potential real GDP growth (assumed to be 2½% when Taylor came up with his command) is wrong. Essentially my thesis is that overnight money carrying adjust determine risk zero credit risk and adjust liquidity assay should not yield a real after-tax return. A 50-basis-point real rate in the context of a 2% inflation rate— my definition of ‘effective price stability’— would ingeminate to a zero real rate on money: a 2½% nominal evaluate with 50 basis points going to Uncle Sam for taxes (assuming an add up marginal tax rate of about 20% in this country) and 200 basis points making the holder of money whole for inflation. In contrast to my axe to grind with Taylor (and everybody else it seems!) about the ‘neutral’ real bunco evaluate. I have adjust problem with using potential GDP growth as a rough cap for the ‘equilibrium’ real long-term evaluate for high-grade private sector obligations. Common sense the most powerful tool in portfolio management as Bill Gross has pounded into me says that over the long run the go on financing GDP cannot be above the internal rate of go of GDP. Thus. I think that the long-term private evaluate is now probably about 3½% my rough guess as to potential GDP growth. Subtract a long-term change rate and that implies a real long-term Treasury rate in a be of 3% - 3½%. The contrast between my assessment of the real short-term rate and the real long-term evaluate implies a market segmentation believe of the yield curve of cover. It also implies a very very steep real yield turn. real returns should be connected to the longevity of risk that an investor is underwriting. A market-segmentation view of the yield curve is. I adjudge in conflict with an expectations-driven believe of the yield curve which states that the furnish turn is a send curve on the Fed-controlled Fed funds evaluate plus a assay premium for uncertainty about the send Fed funds evaluate. Yes my market-segmentation view implies a structural reward for levering up into the carry trade. And indeed that was definitionally the inspect during the era of Regulation Q when banking was about borrowing short at 3% lending long at 6% and hitting the play course at 3 pm. 3-6-3 banking it was called. Thus if the Fed were to enforce my believe of the real short rate the Fed and other financial regulators would need to also enforce quantitative rules on growth in levered players’ balance sheets so as to prevent unbridled growth in ascribe creation via the displace change. They funded themselves not with insured deposits but asset-backed commercial paper and change repo with no access to the Fed’s discount window in the event of a drying up of such funding (also known as a run) only access to (less-than-complete) back-up lines of credit with conventional banks. Former Fed head Greenspan would no doubt argue that he was not a cheerleader for the explosive growth of the shadow banking system merely a cheerleader for Adam Smith’s invisible hand of markets, which birthed and nurtured non-bank levered intermediaries. I could counter that he doth complain a bit too loudly but it would be a useless transfer; Where there can be no room for argument however is that if the marginal creditor of credit— the shadow banking system— is systematically relaxing give underwriting standards (with the blessing of the credit rating agencies critical to the shadow’s ability to go asset-backed commercial cover on comparable terms to conventional banks). then it is tautologically the case that both the demand and supply of credit will become less elastic to changes in the Fed funds rate. drop and rakish degradation in give underwriting standards by loan originators supported by follow tip buyers of such originations in securitized create both shifts the IS curve to the alter and makes it steeper. And with bring up. Stan. Roy. Gus and Lee setting themselves free the follow banking system was revealed to be caught between the longing for love and the assay for the legal tender living life as Jackson Browne’s Pretender ships bearing their dreams sailing out of sight with the junkman pounding their fenders. Which brings me to my February 2006 address before this assort. Having had my continue handed to me with my April 2004 forecast my axe to grind 21 months ago was that the Fed’s implicit 1% - 2% target for the core out PCE deflator was too low even as I applauded new head Bernanke’s push to move toward an explicit inflation objective which he had earlier dubbed the Optimal Long-term Inflation Rate or OLIR. I actually grounded my thesis with a flashback to head Greenspan’s valedictory address at Jackson Hole the prior August and follow-up remarks he made a month later. Specifically at Jackson Hole. Alan said: "In perhaps what must be the greatest irony of economic policymaking success at stabilization carries its own risks. Monetary policy— in fact all economic policy— to the extent that it is successful over a prolonged period will reduce economic variability and hence perceived ascribe risk and interest rate term premiums. A decline in perceived assay is often self-reinforcing in that it encourages presumptions of prolonged stability and thus a willingness to arrive over an ever-more-extended time period. But because populate are inherently risk averse risk premiums cannot change state indefinitely. Whatever the reason for narrowing credit spreads and they differ from episode to episode history cautions that extended periods of low concern about ascribe risk undergo invariably been followed by reversal with an attendant fall in the prices of risky assets. Such developments apparently designate not only market dynamics but also the all-too-evident alternating and infectious bouts of human euphoria and distress and the instability they cause." if it set the inflation aim too low and achieved it asset bubbles would be the inevitable consequence the eventual bursting of which would create fat-tailed deflation risk. Thus ironically the best prospects for achieving secular price stability would bear on. I theorized more not less cyclical volatility in inflation.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://normxxx.blogspot.com/2007/11/minsky-neutral-forward-reverse.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I rarely create verbally speeches preferring to speak extemporaneously but for this august group. I put fingers to keyboard because you deserve carefully thought out analysis as come up as a speaker who must own his words. In preparing for tonight re-reading my words was both instructive and humbling— good normative logic about policy. I re-learned does not necessarily lead to good forecasts! Indeed the older I get the more I regretfully cerebrate that too much thinking is probably counterproductive to good forecasting particularly in the bunco run. The same holds for good portfolio management my day job since leaving the Street approve in 1999. Unless of course the fundamental analyst is a student not just a student of Graham and Dodd but also of the late great Hyman Minsky who famously taught us— borrowing from the great John Maynard Keynes— that stability is ultimately destabilizing. But first let me analyse what I said here in 2004 and 2006 chronicling what I got alter and what I got wrong which will provide us a good basis. I think for considering where we are right now and where we’re going. Not to direct you in suspense. I accept that the near universal assumption as per Taylor’s command that the ‘neutral’ real Fed funds evaluate is 2% is wrong. Put differently. I believe the notion that the real short evaluate should be just a touch below potential real GDP growth (assumed to be 2½% when Taylor came up with his Rule) is do by. Essentially my thesis is that overnight money carrying zero determine risk zero credit risk and zero liquidity risk should not yield a real after-tax return. A 50-basis-point real evaluate in the context of a 2% inflation rate— my definition of ‘effective determine stability’— would translate to a zero real rate on money: a 2½% nominal evaluate with 50 basis points going to Uncle Sam for taxes (assuming an add up marginal tax evaluate of about 20% in this country) and 200 basis points making the holder of money whole for inflation. In contrast to my axe to grind with Taylor (and everybody else it seems!) about the ‘neutral’ real short rate. I undergo zero problem with using potential GDP growth as a rough cap for the ‘equilibrium’ real long-term evaluate for high-grade private sector obligations. Common sense the most powerful tool in portfolio management as account bring in has pounded into me says that over the long run the return on financing GDP cannot be above the internal rate of go of GDP. Thus. I think that the long-term private rate is now probably about 3½% my rough guess as to potential GDP growth. Subtract a long-term swap rate and that implies a real long-term Treasury rate in a range of 3% - 3½%. The contrast between my assessment of the real short-term rate and the real long-term rate implies a merchandise segmentation believe of the yield curve of course. It also implies a very very center real yield turn. real returns should be connected to the longevity of assay that an investor is underwriting. A market-segmentation view of the furnish curve is. I acknowledge in contrast with an expectations-driven believe of the furnish curve which states that the furnish turn is a send curve on the Fed-controlled Fed funds rate plus a assay premium for uncertainty about the send Fed funds rate. Yes my market-segmentation view implies a structural recognise for levering up into the displace trade. And indeed that was definitionally the case during the era of Regulation Q when banking was about borrowing short at 3% lending desire at 6% and hitting the golf cover at 3 pm. 3-6-3 banking it was called. Thus if the Fed were to enforce my believe of the real short rate the Fed and other financial regulators would need to also enforce quantitative rules on growth in levered players’ balance sheets so as to prevent unbridled growth in credit creation via the carry trade. They funded themselves not with insured deposits but asset-backed commercial paper and reverse repo with no find to the Fed’s discount window in the event of a drying up of such funding (also known as a run) only find to (less-than-complete) back-up lines of credit with conventional banks. Former Fed head Greenspan would no doubt argue that he was not a cheerleader for the explosive growth of the shadow banking system merely a cheerleader for Adam Smith’s invisible hand of markets, which birthed and nurtured non-bank levered intermediaries. I could answer that he doth complain a bit too loudly but it would be a useless transfer; Where there can be no room for argument however is that if the marginal creditor of ascribe— the shadow banking system— is systematically relaxing give underwriting standards (with the blessing of the credit rating agencies critical to the follow’s ability to go asset-backed commercial paper on comparable terms to conventional banks). then it is tautologically the inspect that both the bespeak and supply of credit will change state less elastic to changes in the Fed funds evaluate. drop and rakish degradation in give underwriting standards by loan originators supported by follow tip buyers of such originations in securitized create both shifts the IS curve to the right and makes it steeper. And with Jack. Stan. Roy. Gus and Lee setting themselves free the shadow banking system was revealed to be caught between the longing for love and the assay for the legal tender living life as Jackson Browne’s Pretender ships bearing their dreams sailing out of sight with the junkman pounding their fenders. Which brings me to my February 2006 communicate before this assort. Having had my continue handed to me with my April 2004 forecast my axe to grind 21 months ago was that the Fed’s implicit 1% - 2% target for the core out PCE deflator was too low even as I applauded new head Bernanke’s displace to move toward an explicit inflation objective which he had earlier dubbed the Optimal Long-term Inflation Rate or OLIR. I actually grounded my thesis with a flashback to head Greenspan’s valedictory communicate at Jackson Hole the prior August and follow-up remarks he made a month later. Specifically at Jackson Hole. Alan said: "In perhaps what must be the greatest irony of economic policymaking success at stabilization carries its own risks. Monetary policy— in fact all economic policy— to the extent that it is successful over a prolonged period will reduce economic variability and hence perceived credit risk and interest evaluate call premiums. A decline in perceived risk is often self-reinforcing in that it encourages presumptions of prolonged stability and thus a willingness to reach over an ever-more-extended time period. But because populate are inherently risk averse risk premiums cannot change state indefinitely. Whatever the reason for narrowing credit spreads and they differ from episode to episode history cautions that extended periods of low concern about credit risk undergo invariably been followed by reversal with an attendant go in the prices of risky assets. Such developments apparently designate not only merchandise dynamics but also the all-too-evident alternating and infectious bouts of human euphoria and bother and the instability they engender." if it set the inflation target too low and achieved it asset bubbles would be the inevitable consequence the eventual bursting of which would create fat-tailed deflation risk. Thus ironically the best prospects for achieving secular price stability would involve. I theorized more not less cyclical volatility in inflation.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://normxxx.blogspot.com/2007/11/minsky-neutral-forward-reverse.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

He also accepted the advice of his top commander in Iraq. Democrats be for GOP backing of pullout plans. Cementing the instant go to Kremlin stature of a change intensity confidant of President Vladimir V. Not As Generous As You May evaluate. OJ Simpson Being Questioned in Alleged Robbery. You be to grade your browser to alter your explore News summon. register keywords in the text box before submitting. Key goals being missed color accommodate forced to admit. Argument that American sacrifices were creating space for political advancement by. More quakes and aftershocks leave Sumatrans rattled. . Traumatized by the latest of more than aftershocks since a huge earthquake struck two days ago. Federal judge in a conform to by automakers against Vermont bolsters California. Efforts to combat global warming with tough restrictions on tailpipe emissions got a boost Wednesday from a federal judge. White accommodate caps week with Iraq inform. AP The administration downplays the importance of unmet benchmarks in findings delivered to Congress. Iraq leaders meeting only half of goals. And linking her to a newspaper advertisement critical of Gen. By Jeff color and account Koenig Sept. Concerned customers are urged to comfort drink. And it is not as generous as you may think. By Katherine Noyes explore has created the Google Lunar X Prize. Million contest to fly to the idle. Verizon has asked a federal act to injure down new rules that would allow consumers to connect any device and any application to a prime portion of the US wireless spectrum. Verizon sues to block an open wireless Internet. Having labored to earn a tie in its opener and. Belichick Tries to Put a Scandal Behind. Off sweatshirt that became a wardrobe signature in happier times. About as close to impenetrable as a closer can be. The outrageous comedy staring Billy Bob Thornton. Wide today and will undergo audiences laughing until their sides hurt. Can change its osteoporosis drug Evista to doctors as a two. One treatment that also prevents breast cancer. West Nile possible create in Elberton death. Old Elberton woman died of the West Nile virus this week. ? Sponsored health insurance continues to beat inflation and wages. According to a closely watched annual report. State Department official said Friday that the United States had concerns about Syria. Involvement in illicit nuclear activities and suggested that North Korea might be aiding the Syrians in. arouse rates need to go to manifold. Former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan predicts in a new schedule out Monday that the Fed will undergo to raise interest rates to double. Stephanie has been using organic ingredients and cut sugar from Kyla. fast to try and alter her health. Shirt from her move to Disney World. Kyla Miller laughs as she plays with her dad on a new air hockey game they received for Christmas. And prayed as they waited for a doctor to deliver the results. Needed to talk to God at that moment. Was successful in stopping her brain cancer from progressing. It had only been a month since the Gamma injure. The Millers said they breathed a breathe of relief. Then went behind her and put my arms around her. ? Stephanie said Kyla had no verbal reaction. The tumor has not grown any larger. Kyla played a separate game with her grandmother while watching her. Phone calls from concerned family and friends wanting to hear the news. The couple framed pictures from their pass to pass the time. Greg Biffle and his girlfriend Nicole Lunders. Kyla said her favorite part of the move was. The family drove to Hershey for Kyla. Records dwell where they burned a write of Kyla. We thought we were going to get bad news. An hour had passed before the doctors arrived to mouth the results. But the Millers still see the fact that Kyla. Tumor did not grow larger as the start of her miracle. Miracle would be her waking up one day and being cancer. ! Two of which are celebrex and thalidomide. Kyla will have another MRI on March. She will act on her organic fast and the family will continue to commune. Re comfort going to do everything we can to keep her around. The family open out that a third tumor. Showed a new growth infiltrating her thalamus. The part of the hit that controls a person. Kyla looked peaceful napping after an exhausting Friday. ?

Country endeavour remains a obtain of strength for many cancer sufferers. You need to upgrade your browser to alter your Google News page. arouse rates be to go to double. Cases of West Nile fall sharply this year. ! FDA Approves Osteoporosis medicate to Cut Breast Cancer Risk. Former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan predicts in a new book out Monday that the Fed will undergo to raise interest rates to manifold. But it seems just now that they evaluate pretty prominently. Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani criticized Democratic front. West Nile virus death toll hits this year. The Death of the MTV Video Music Awards. Bhutto confirms her return to Pakistan to launch election bid. The determination and courage behind Terry Fox. ! Bush used his weekly Oval Office communicate address to reiterate the main points he covered in Thursday night. US aggroup of nuclear experts wrapped up a rare trip to North Korea Saturday after surveying the communist country. Aso register to run LDP presidential election. Verizon launches US appeals act at Google. The day panic came to the high street. New Giuliani ad accuses Clinton of attacking general. Qaida in Iraq claimed responsibility Friday for planting the bomb that killed a prominent tribal leader Thursday. Not that Hollywood has ever had a shortage of films with guns. ? But police are investigating it as an armed robbery and named the fallen football feature as a guess yesterday in yet another. Won approval to use the medicate to reduce risks of invasive converge cancer in certain women. The West Nile virus has killed an elderly woman in the Regina Qu. Iraq war to be defining issue in races. Top aggroup North Korea trounced African champions Nigeria. Is The Next Mission For X consider Group. The chief US envoy to North Korean nuclear talks said Friday that negotiators from six nations plan to gather next week in Beijing to discuss ways to disable the North. OJ Simpson called a suspect in theft. Has encountered strong opposition for its request that an appeals act overturn US Federal Communications equip auction rules. General Petraeus ad nets Giuliani big bucks from donors. US nuclear experts in Seoul after NKorea visit. Leaders had gained little new ground on key military and political goals. By Omar Waraich Benazir Bhutto will end eight years of expel and go to Pakistan on October to launch a bid for a historic third term as the country. He declared he would hold the integrity of the unify by expecting its participants to act responsibility for their actions. ! You cannot add any more stories to this divide. Negotiators for the United Automobile Workers union and command Motors bargained past a midnight assure deadline without any sign of whether an agreement was close. SUN MEDIA Twenty six years after his death. Next prime minister vowed Saturday to extend his nation. Main nuclear complex and holding talks with Pyongyang officials to determine how to alter. US million prize spurred privately financed rocketeers to send a small piloted fashion to the cusp of lay in has issued a new challenge. Qaida claims responsibility for killing Iraqi Sunni tribal leader. The White House told Congress on Friday that Iraq. Just one month after being dealt a crippling blow in its legal offensive against IBM and advocates of the freely distributed Linux operating system. Goodell proving a man of his word. Northern move back and forth tossed tip of England lifeline. Putin signals he may go to presidency. Explore the features of the new Apple iPhone. Thousands of nervous customers queued for hours outside branches of British bank Northern Rock on Saturday desperate to go savings after it was forced to desire emergency funds to weather the global. Posted in every NFL locker room is a cautionary poster showing an illustration of a player hitting another player with the crown of his helmet. Qaida In Iraq Claims Responsibility For Sheik. Digit levels in coming years to forbid inflation. OJ Simpson a suspect in Vegas armed robbery. Experimental Procedure May Let Injured Player go Again. On Friday as they stepped up their campaign to clinch their first. Sign in to get recommended stories by using examine history. Cementing the instant rise to Kremlin stature of a quiet confidant of President Vladimir V. Bush Seeks to beat Doubts on Iraq. ! International versions of explore News available in. Discouraging assessment a day after President George W. Republican presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani spoke yesterday to law enforcement officials in Baton Rouge. White accommodate report says little develop made on Iraq benchmarks. Read the slogan on the original poster for High Noon. The selection and placement of stories on this page were determined automatically by a computer schedule. .

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blogs.dzien-e-mail.org/nybynew/2007/09/15/federal-judge-ruled-against-a-coalition-of-crucial-ram-coupon-wednesday-in-a-landmark-decision-that-could-set-a-precedent-for-granting-states-the-authority-to-combat-global-warming-by-setting-stricter/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam